by Nadine Safron
Elections have consequences & define our future—Stand up & demand accurate results before it's too late. Act decisively in the only way that truly matters, even if, especially if Trump wins or loses.👇
1. The Unique Power of Densely Populated Cities to Swing Elections
In densely populated cities, a single jurisdiction’s voting pattern can decide outcomes for entire states. Major urban centers like New York City, Los Angeles, and Chicago hold concentrated populations that influence not just local but statewide and even national election results. One significant pattern here is that even minor shifts in large cities can affect the outcomes in swing states.
Election fraud expert Kim Brooks notes that analysis reveals repeated election irregularities from 2018 through 2024, showing entrenched patterns of fraud. This impact is further underscored by recent findings: The GA nerds’ revelations of nearly 300,000 questionable votes from 2020 and similar findings in 2022 highlight a disturbing pattern. Their work has gone unchallenged, with overwhelming proof ignored by officials despite its peer-reviewed credibility. This demonstrates how entrenched this issue has become.
With so many people casting ballots in these areas, small fraudulent acts can scale into significant election swings. While some would claim such fraud is minimal, high-density populations make it easy for small percentage changes to appear credible.
2. The Logistics of Fraud: Why Cities are the Perfect Targets
Election security is as strong as its weakest link, and densely populated urban centers are complex webs where verifying identities, tracking residency, and auditing ballot authenticity are far more challenging than in smaller locales. The sheer volume of people voting by mail or absentee in major cities provides opportunities to introduce ballots that go largely unnoticed.
In urban centers, ballot harvesting and mail-in voting are particularly prevalent, often under the guise of accessibility. However, these practices present loopholes: ballots are sometimes submitted on behalf of people who did not vote themselves, or even of individuals who no longer live in the area, providing opportunities for massive fraud.
3. The Convenience of Political Assumptions
Most of us take it for granted that cities are “blue” because we’re told as much by the media and pollsters. But historical and demographic data paints a more complex picture. In the past, cities had a balanced political spectrum, with conservatives and liberals coexisting. But in recent years, high-profile races in big cities show that turnout and vote counts in favor of one party are suspiciously high, suggesting either that many have changed their politics, or the count doesn’t reflect the true voter sentiment.
By insisting that cities are naturally left-leaning, mainstream narratives silence skeptics who question the lopsided numbers emerging from urban areas. But when people in these areas start noticing inconsistencies, the façade begins to crack.
4. The Efficiency of Manipulation in Large Cities
In high-density cities, administrative resources are stretched thin, making oversight more challenging. Combine that with the fact that cities often have limited time and personnel to verify the legitimacy of every ballot in districts with tens of thousands of voters, and you have a recipe for fraud. Imagine trying to verify the validity of hundreds of thousands of ballots—this is an overwhelming task in any city, let alone one with limited staffing or resources. High-density voter fraud is simply easier to execute without close scrutiny.
In addition, many city officials responsible for overseeing elections belong to political organizations with vested interests in election outcomes. This can lead to loose oversight or even intentional gaps in security protocols, which, in high-density areas, can be exploited with ease. In some cases, local mayors and city councils hold the authority to establish their own election procedures, creating additional opportunities for manipulation. We have reported instances of non-American Chinese nationals aligned with CCP interests on elections commissions in cities like San Francisco. These commissions, which oversee and set policies for the city’s Department of Elections, introduce potential avenues for foreign influence over our most crucial democratic processes.
Do the math. The risks are as clear as they are dangerous.
The battle isn't just about one election—it's about the survival of America’s sovereignty. Without immediate action from red state governors and leaders like Kristi Noem and Ron DeSantis, election fraud will persist unchecked.
5. Rising Doubts: Growing Recognition of Fraud in Urban Areas
Polling results often show that confidence in election integrity is low, with major urban centers being pinpointed as the epicenters of these doubts. Yet discussions about urban election integrity are frequently dismissed as conspiracy theories. But why?
Note: nearly century-old laws (70 years old) that permit boards of canvassers to investigate fraud are being removed to all but make the fraud unchallengeable, as noted in this short video (above) on Fraud and the only way to counter it.
Those who raise concerns are quickly labeled as spreading misinformation. However, grassroots efforts are now emerging from urban communities questioning their own “blue” status. Many are beginning to realize they might not be as heavily Democratic-leaning as reported, and that fraudulent activities might be artificially skewing results. Urban residents have a right to question how secure and legitimate their vote is, especially if they feel their voices aren’t being accurately represented.
6. Media and Polling Bias Reinforce the Blue City Myth
Polling plays a role in shaping public perception about “blue” cities. While pollsters and media outlets claim cities are overwhelmingly Democratic, many people in urban areas feel differently. Polling can be skewed based on the methodologies used and the demographics targeted. These results reinforce a “blue” bias that might not reflect reality.
Media coverage also plays a role in perpetuating the idea that cities lean left. News organizations that focus on progressive perspectives have influence over public perception in major cities, reinforcing the assumption of urban leftism and discouraging voter accountability questions.
7. A Call for Accountability and Vigilance in Urban Election Centers
Ultimately, ensuring the accuracy and security of the voting process in densely populated areas is crucial for everyone, regardless of political affiliation. The stakes are far too high to ignore vulnerabilities in high-density cities where fraud can be easily scaled. This is not just about an election; it’s about preserving the foundation of democracy itself. Large-scale fraud in these areas undermines every citizen’s right to fair representation, eroding confidence in our institutions and risking severe consequences.
ACT NOW TO STOP THIS, OR YOUR INACTION IS POTENTIALLY EFFECTIVELY A VOTE FOR KAMALA—OR FOR A BLUE CONGRESS POISED TO IMPEACH TRUMP.
(Action plan to mobilize red state leaders)
Remember, the need for action goes far beyond November 5, 2024. Whether Trump wins or loses, the battle continues. If he loses, there’s a need for renewed accountability and reforms to prevent further erosion of trust and deal with other far more pressing issues detailed in this article. If he wins, we must remain vigilant, as he could face unprecedented challenges in certification, threats of impeachment, and a potentially stolen House and Senate—both of which, in any event, have been largely compromised for the last four years, with RINOs as influenced by CCP interests as Democrats. Regardless of the outcome, decisive action now is paramount to uphold election integrity and protect our democratic process for the future.
Conclusion: It’s Time to Question the “Blue” City Assumption
The narrative that densely populated cities are unquestionably “blue” serves an agenda, but it may not represent reality. Urban areas are ripe for manipulation because of their size, complexity, and lower level of scrutiny, making fraud harder to detect and control. Americans deserve a system that respects the true will of all voters, urban and rural alike. Without question, safeguarding the integrity of high-density city votes is essential for ensuring that the voice of every American is accurately represented.
The Cost of Assumptions: Democracy at Risk
Ultimately, safeguarding democracy demands we challenge assumptions, insist on transparency, and hold our systems accountable—starting with the illusion of the “blue” city. It’s a misconception to believe that most residents in urban centers support crippling inflation, soaring crime rates, or the radical policies endorsed by Kamala Harris and Tim Walz. Both, through their policies and actions over the past four years, have acted in ways that unmistakably align with CCP interests. Their aggressive advancement of these agendas is so indistinguishable from that of direct agents that it raises profound questions about where loyalties lie—especially given the influence of hundreds of thousands of CCP operatives operating freely across the U.S. If we don’t recognize this and demand action, the consequences for our nation’s future could be dire.
The Call to Action: Preserve Our Democracy
Elections have consequences. As citizens, it’s our duty to ensure accurate representation through legitimate processes. The silent war being waged on U.S. democracy can only be countered by decisive, immediate action.
Act now to restore America, even if Trump wins, he will need the assistance listed in this article.
#ElectionIntegrity
#VoterFraud
#DefendDemocracy
#CivilDefenseCoalition
#SaveAmerica
#ElectionSecurity
#ProtectTheVote
#UnrestrictedWarfare
#AIWargaming
#ExposeTheFraud
Share this post