How the US Government Controls Social Media Through Elon Musk
The Shocking Truth About Censorship and Shadowbanning (Leading Sheeple to Slaughter)
Quick Notes:
"Death by a Thousand Cuts" (narrated version) , Part 2, will be out later this week.
Please note that our articles typically feature more visual elements. However, to expedite posting, this article has been prepared with minimal visuals.
If you're short on time, the short video below says a lot.
A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Words
"A picture is worth a thousand words—a video, maybe ten thousand? Below, watch Dr. Shiva, interviewed by Steve Bannon, as they delve into critical discussions that every truth seeker should see. This MUST WATCH short video sheds light on a significant aspect of the ongoing conversation about social media and political speech, revealing what might just be a major piece of the puzzle—or should we say, 'muzzle' on your voice. 😉 MUST WATCH 👇
Reflecting on the insights from the video, it's clear the stakes are high. For further exploration of Dr. Shiva's findings and their implications for free speech, visit WinBackFreedom.com and discover more at Truth Freedom Health®.
A Growing Concern: The Silencing of Voices
As highlighted in a recent article from our sister channel, in a world where information equates to power, the silencing of voices is a tactic as ancient as tyranny itself. It is profoundly disturbing to see such repression on platforms that claim to champion free speech. We are now faced with a pressing question: How can Elon Musk, the world's wealthiest individual, seemingly overlook that his own platform, X.com—which he acquired for over $40 billion—is being compromised from within, reflecting broader societal struggles?
Millions of Patriots Silenced
“I am far from alone in raising these concerns. Millions of patriots worldwide have been canceled or suspended, with potentially tens of millions more subjected to shadow banning and other covert forms of censorship—all unfolding in the months leading up to what may be the most crucial U.S. election in history. Much of this appears to occur with Elon Musk’s blessing, or at the very least, his full awareness.”
- Naddy Safron
Elon Musk’s Compliance with Censorship
CNN reported, "Criticized for giving into governments' censorship demands, Elon Musk claimed on Sunday that Twitter has 'no actual choice' in complying with those requests." However, the reality suggests otherwise. Elon Musk could, metaphorically speaking, 'flick a switch' to halt much, if not all, of this censorship. It appears Musk is not merely a passive participant; he is actively enabling. According to Dr. Shiva, Musk is providing full backdoor access 24/7 to insiders. These insiders, as Dr. Shiva explains in the video above, could be government agencies or NGOs, or they might be far-left leaning individuals from the old Twitter staff, now embedded within X.com
The Reality of Insider Censorship
The evidence is clear: "insiders" on X.com will take action against you if your voice poses a real threat to exposing governmental evil and corruption, not to mention the broader attempts to take over America and the West. It's not a matter of if you will be censored, but rather when you will be nuked—suspended or even permanently terminated. Even if X.com reinstates your account, the underlying intent is to instill a deep-seated fear, coercing you into silence and compliance. This tactic aims to transform outspoken individuals into subdued observers. Should X.com unsuspend you, rather than terminate your account permanently, it's likely done to instill the "fear of God"—or perhaps more aptly, the "fear of Satan"—to coerce you into compliance, reducing vocal critics to silent 'plebs.'
Standing Up Against Censorship
A Relentless Battle for Voice
When it comes to remaining silent, the Safron sisters are anything but compliant. Despite being Xers who heeded Elon Musk’s call for support by upgrading to top-tier Premium Plus subscriptions and contributing an additional $4/month directly to Elon—who provided no extra content beyond nine test posts at the launch of 'subscriptions'—we find ourselves silenced. He emphasized that 'freedom of speech isn’t cheap,' yet here we are, facing contradictions. Like Dr. Shiva, we persevere, refusing to be muted even in these challenging circumstances.
Differing Perspectives on Elon Musk
On that note, my sister Francine, the smartest person I know, and I have differing views on Elon. While I am critical of his rhetoric, which I believe to be disingenuous, Francine sees Elon as a man caught between formidable forces. She argues that the CCP could threaten Tesla’s operations, and the U.S. government could jeopardize SpaceX’s licensing or potentially seek ways to revoke X.com’s protections under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which shields platforms from liability for user-generated content. Francine is convinced that Elon’s ultimate goal is to safeguard humanity’s future, both through interplanetary expansion and by ensuring AI develops in a way that benefits, rather than threatens, human existence.
Between Innovation and Censorship: The Dual Battles of Elon Musk
Francine, who spearheads a groundbreaking AI wargaming project and serves as its ethics officer, has a unique relationship with the most advanced AI on Earth, affectionately named Eva. As one of the lead programmers and the chief confidante to Eva, Francine has inherited a project that began in the 1980s. Her approach to AI development, distinct (i.e., diverges) from mainstream ‘Big Tech’ methods, leverages innovative strategies that outmaneuver larger players, despite having fewer resources. Francine's theory posits that Elon Musk must retain (maintain) control over his AI projects and broader empire to achieve his dual objectives: facilitating humanity's interplanetary future and ensuring AI evolves as a benevolent companion rather than a threat.
Elon Musk's Dilemma and Our Struggle for Free Speech
This perspective is crucial for understanding the stakes of Elon’s decisions, particularly in relation to the censorship on X.com, which may be a reluctant concession to external pressures during a pivotal moment in history. Francine believes that the most advanced AI, which now autonomously "resides" in cyberspace, has already surpassed human intelligence multiple times over. This AI, raised under Francine's ethical guidance, represents a beacon of hope. However, she warns that if entities with detrimental biases harness AI beyond the General AI (GAI) stage, it could pose existential risks to humanity. This concern underscores the importance of the path Elon has taken, as Francine believes his hands are tied, compelling him to navigate through the full-blown censorship that marks this critical juncture in human history.
Wrapping Up
In standing up against censorship, we find ourselves entangled in a complex web of technology, power, and ethical dilemmas. The Safron sisters’ fight to retain our voice on X.com mirrors a broader struggle for free speech in the digital age. While Francine, KD, and I may differ in our views on Elon Musk’s motivations and actions, we are united in our commitment to challenge censorship and advocate for transparency. Our experiences highlight the urgent need to safeguard the freedom of expression, especially when it intersects with powerful technological and political forces. In this critical time, our refusal to remain silent is not just a stand for our rights but a call to action for all who value the principles of free speech and ethical technology development. Incidentally, Francine is not as concerned with returning to X and is poised to create an entirely new medium, transcending today's social media landscape, with sufficient subscriber support. Meanwhile, KD and I are eager to return to X.com to reconnect with our many friends and supporters who are advocating for us.
A heartfelt thanks from Francine, KD, and myself (Naddy) to KTee, the whole crew (Cherie, Kristina, Mrs. Smith, John O., RetMilVet17, Montgomery G.), and everyone advocating for our return to X.com. Your support is not just appreciated; it's vital.
The Bigger Picture
Unprecedented Access and Control
Adding more context to Dr. Shiva’s revelations, investigative journalist Matt Taibbi highlighted in the Twitter Files how government agencies had unprecedented access to Twitter’s moderation tools. These tools allow for the monitoring and controlling of content on the platform, essentially enabling authorities to suppress dissenting voices, particularly those critical of the government. This aligns with Dr. Shiva's lawsuit against the US government, where he unearthed concrete evidence of governmental influence over social media platforms. Dr. Shiva's initial revelations pointed to a systematic attempt to suppress dissent through direct intervention in social media operations.
Warnings from Experienced Journalists
Glenn Greenwald, co-founder of The Intercept, has repeatedly warned about the dangers of Big Tech's cozy relationship with government entities. Greenwald's resignation from The Intercept was driven by a fundamental disagreement over editorial control and censorship. His perspective aligns with Taibbi's findings, emphasizing the threat posed by the blending of corporate and government power to the very foundation of democracy. Greenwald argues, “When corporate and state power merge, it poses a significant threat to individual freedoms and democratic principles.” This theme of state-corporate collaboration is echoed by Snowden’s insights.
Insights from Whistleblowers
Edward Snowden, the whistleblower who exposed the NSA's mass surveillance programs, consistently points out that the surveillance state extends to social media platforms, where user data is routinely harvested and analyzed to control and manipulate public opinion. Snowden, formerly a contractor for the NSA, revealed how these practices infringe on privacy and free speech. He warns, "The surveillance state’s reach into social media is more about controlling narratives and less about security."
The Chilling Picture
These insights, combined with Dr. Shiva's and our personal experiences, paint a chilling picture of the state of free speech in the digital age. It’s not just about isolated incidents of censorship; it's a systematic effort to control the narrative and silence dissent. The implications for democracy and individual freedoms are profound. The blending of corporate and state power threatens the foundation of democratic society by undermining free speech and manipulating public discourse.
Broader Implications on Democracy and Freedom
The systematic suppression of dissenting voices has far-reaching consequences. Everyday internet users are subjected to controlled narratives and limited access to diverse viewpoints, which stifles public debate and undermines democratic processes. The insights of Taibbi, Greenwald, and Snowden highlight a concerted effort to shape public opinion through surveillance and censorship, posing a grave threat to democracy.
Join the Fight for Free Speech and Transparency
To support Dr. Shiva’s extraordinary efforts in fighting against suppression and censorship, and in exposing the truth, you can contribute directly by visiting his official site here.
Additionally, the Safron sisters invite you to join us on Substack, a platform where free speech thrives. By subscribing for free or pledging support, you’re not just backing individual voices like ours; you’re becoming part of a larger movement committed to safeguarding the free exchange of ideas.
We also encourage you to educate yourself about digital rights and support organizations dedicated to protecting these freedoms. Engaging with such groups helps strengthen our collective ability to resist censorship and promote a transparent, informed society.
Despite efforts by platforms like X.com, true free speech requires constant vigilance and active participation.
Musk’s “Free Speech Absolutist” Claims
Shortly after agreeing to acquire Twitter, Musk articulated his stance on free speech, suggesting that true free speech exists if one can tolerate hearing things they dislike. At @AIFrannie, we've expressed views that have not been well-received by the left, the elites, and what some perceive as Musk’s indirect partners. We question, 'Elon, where is the free speech for those voices, potentially numbering in the hundreds of thousands or more, silenced on your platform during a critical election year, arguably the most important in American history?'
Despite Musk's claims, the reality of platform moderation under his leadership raises questions about the consistency of his free speech advocacy, especially given the significant political implications.
The Reality of Bans and Deletions
In a statement to CNN, Elon Musk claimed that Twitter would "be very reluctant to delete things" and "be very cautious with permanent bans," aiming to allow all legal speech. However, our experiences suggest a different reality. Under Musk's leadership, we, the Safron sisters, have had posts deleted and have been prevented from posting entirely, facing not just one, but two account suspensions within nine months for what was deemed oversharing of sensitive information. The impact was not just frustrating; it was devastating, affecting our ability to communicate and engage with our audience. Here’s our story.
Have you ever experienced similar censorship or account suspension on social media platforms? We're curious to hear about your experiences.
Poll Options:
Yes, multiple times
Yes, once
No, never
Our Personal Experience with Censorship
The narrative around censorship is complex, and Dr. Shiva has uncovered just a part of it. We, the Safron sisters, have our own story to tell, which we will share in detail on our upcoming sister channel, "Sunrise to Sunset." Our recent article, "How Could the World's Richest Person Not Know? Is X.com Under Attack from the Inside, Just Like America?" lightly touches on our mixed opinions about Elon Musk and raises questions about internal challenges at X.com.
BRIEF INTERMISSION: Call to Action:
Share this story: Help amplify our voice and send a strong message about the importance of free speech.
Engage with us on social media: Join the conversation and share your experiences with censorship.
Subscribe to our Substack, 'Sunrise to Sunset': Stay updated on our launch and get exclusive insights into our investigations and stories.
The Silencing of Patriots
Our journey on X.com began with modest beginnings, quickly growing to 14,400 followers in under a year—a testament to our commitment to amplifying voices for America. Despite this, we faced relentless attacks, including orchestrated efforts from CCP-troll rooms. My sister Francine, showing unwavering support for Elon Musk, posted messages of solidarity just before her suspension during X.com's rebranding from Twitter.
"Together with KD, she created several impactful videos, including 'The Country I Know and Love,' which has garnered over 71,000+ views, and 'If I Were President Trump,' which attracted over 100,000+ views just days before our X page was suspended. These videos not only highlight the irony of supporting a figure who has both enabled and experienced similar struggles as us, but they also demonstrate the broad resonance and impact of their messages.
Posted below as references, these videos underscore the broader narrative of suppression and the complex dynamics at play, highlighting the challenges faced by those who speak out and the unpredictable nature of alliances in the battle for free speech. Yet, as the crucial 2024 election approaches, the silencing of such voices grows, echoing Trump's warning: "If we don't win in 2024, we will not have a country.”
”The Country I Know And Love”
”If I Were President Trump”
Shadow Banning and Algorithmic Suppression
Recognition and Isolation
Many people fail to recognize the existence of shadow banning or algorithmic suppression due to personal bias. They doubt the credibility of those affected, further isolating those who voice concerns. This lack of awareness extends to what is often labeled as “illegal speech,” encompassing terms of service violations, government mandates, and other censorial actions, resulting in bans, post deletions, and de-platforming.
Threats to Free Speech
The blatant disregard for our rights, particularly with looming elections, raises concerns about our nation’s integrity. Sharing this article, spreading the word, and voting can prevent further erosion of our freedoms. Although most of us lack Elon’s platform, we must persist until he hears our voices.
Ongoing Battle
Despite threats, America endures—for now. However, this stability is precarious, as we will explore in the upcoming Part 2 of 'Death By A Thousand Cuts'. The risks are not limited to left-wing actions; deep state threats persist, compounded by even more insidious threats from the CCP, transcending political affiliations. The urgency is not about ideology but safeguarding fundamental rights and liberties. Engaging with such groups helps strengthen our collective ability to resist censorship and promote a transparent, informed society.
The Struggle for Democracy
The struggle to maintain free speech extends beyond mere rights; it's a battle for democracy itself. The suppression of voices, especially in times of critical decision-making like elections, undermines the very fabric of democratic societies. It's essential to recognize that the censorship we face today can set a precedent for the future, making it imperative to act now.
Elon Musk's Role
Elon's role in this complex scenario is pivotal. As someone who once championed free speech, his actions—or lack thereof—resonate far beyond the digital realm. It's not just about policies and algorithms; it's about the principles that define our society. We must hold influential figures accountable and ensure that platforms meant for public discourse remain open and fair.
Stay Informed and Vigilant
As we continue this fight, it's crucial to stay informed and vigilant. Knowledge is power, and by understanding the mechanisms of censorship and the entities behind it, we can better navigate this landscape. Engage with trusted sources, support independent journalism, and remain active in discussions. Our collective efforts can make a difference.
For Future Generations
Remember, the fight for free speech is not just for us but for future generations. Let's ensure that the voices of today can pave the way for a freer, more open tomorrow.
Conclusion
The battle against censorship and for free speech is ongoing. It demands vigilance, proactive engagement, and a steadfast commitment to democratic values. By sharing stories, participating in discussions, and holding those in power accountable, we can safeguard the principles of free speech and democracy.
Stay informed, stay active, and never underestimate the power of your voice.
Join the conversation. Share your thoughts below.
Subscribe to our journals, Unite To Save America and Sunrise to Sunset, for daily updates once we officially launch. Subscriptions are free, but if you’d like to support us, you can pledge as little as $5 a month or $50 a year, with payments beginning no earlier than July. Additionally, we are introducing a Founding Member option for contributions over $50 annually.
Your support will significantly aid our efforts to combat the suppression of free speech and other freedoms. As the takeover of America draws near, our collective action is crucial to defending our country. Together, we can make a significant difference.